Today has been a good day.
I drank one coffee more than I should have and completed my daily three problems in a comfortably short time with each solution also having a comfortably short runtime.
As I hoped, each successful problem has served as a building block for tackling harder problems. The mini-research I do after getting an optimal solution is vital. The Leetcode discussion board, and the wider internet, information that really clicks because the problem that the information helps to solve is still fresh in my head.
Problem: Given a binary search tree, return the sum of all values between
I started out by writing a recursive algorithm that summed the entirety of a BST. I then added logic to check that I actually wanted to sum node's value.
The trick here is skipping the parts of the tree that cannot hold any relevant values. If the
node.left has a value smaller than
L then we are not interested in any deeper parts of that sub-tree.
# Definition for a binary tree node.# class TreeNode(object):# def __init__(self, x):# self.val = x# self.left = None# self.right = Noneclass Solution(object):def rangeSumBST(self, root, L, R):""":type root: TreeNode:type L: int:type R: int:rtype: int"""def recursive_search(node, sum_vals=0):if node.val >= L and node.val <= R:sum_vals += node.valif node.left and node.val >= L:sum_vals += recursive_search(node.left, 0)if node.right and node.val <= R:sum_vals += recursive_search(node.right, 0)return sum_valsreturn recursive_search(root)
Runtime complexity: We may have to search the whole tree, so:
Spacetime complexity: Nothing is created, so
O(1)? Either that, or in the worst case we hold the entire tree in memory (on the stack).
Problem: Given a 2D grid, find the total possible increase to values so that the max(row) and max(column) isn't increased.
Okay, that is a simplification of the problem statement but it's a little hard to understand with a quick scan.
I knew that two iterations would be required and that we needed to keep track of a value for each row and column.
class Solution(object):def maxIncreaseKeepingSkyline(self, grid):""":type grid: List[List[int]]:rtype: int"""max_increase = 0# to store the highest building for x/y viewmax_x =  * len(grid)max_y =  * len(grid)# find the highest buildingsfor x in range(0, len(grid)):for y in range(0, len(grid[x])):max_x[x] = max(grid[x][y], max_x[x])max_y[y] = max(grid[x][y], max_y[y])# sum the possible building increasesfor x in range(0, len(grid)):for y in range(0, len(grid[x])):max_increase += min(max_x[x], max_y[y]) - grid[x][y]return max_increase
One of the optimizations here is to use
max instead of manually checking for higher/lower values.
O(sqrt(n) -- an interesting one.
Problem: Return a permutation of string
T so that the letters are sorted in accordance with the order of string
S has unique characters and will not necessarily contain every letter of the alphabet.
I'm a big fan of my solution to this problem. I'll take any opportunity to use a Set!
from string import ascii_lettersclass Solution(object):def customSortString(self, S, T):""":type S: str:type T: str:rtype: str"""letters = set(ascii_letters)vals = dict()idx = 0# determine the value of given lettersfor i in S:vals[i] = idxletters.remove(i)idx += 1# the value doesn't matter for the restfor i in letters:vals[i] = idxT = list(T)T.sort(key=lambda c: vals[c])return ''.join(T)
There is an optimization here where the unpointed letters are removed from the sorting sequence as their order doesn't matter.
Runtime complexity: We throw away the
nlgn sorting time, so:
Spacetime complexity: This would be
O(1) due to
S having unique characters but we can't sort an immutable string in-place!